Publié : mar. mars 26, 2002 11:34
Sur www.2imagine.net Corran propose un nouveau système de jugement des compèt de FS :
New Judging system proposed.
Schaeftlein/ Addison System
In extended discussions, Arnd Schaeftlein and I sat down, and tried to develop a new system that is based on the accuracy and objectivity of the OLD NOWR system, the current simple subjective system used in Germany, and also of elements that we felt could be used to encourage even further variety, and crowd pleasing acrobatics. The system below is the result of these discussions with Arnd, and discussions with others. I submit it for consideration.
This judging system is designed to simplify the judging to a maximum, while still being effective. This permits event organizers to use less “well trained” judges at smaller events, and still offer a high level of consistency, while offering specific, objective judging that is simple to follow, less likely to miss moves, or err on verticality perspectives than the old system, and encourages variety because a move can only be performed once (because there is no technical adding system). It also makes the judging more understandable to people who are not kayakers (press, TV and general spectators) as well as those who might be watching this on their TV’s at home. In essence, what is spectacular to the untrained eye, is also what scores well. Competitors are thus encouraged to go for “crowd pleasing” moves.
All moves are divided into three categories.
Flat, vertical and aerial.
Flat moves range from 0 to 60 degrees, and vertical moves from 60 to 120 degrees. In both cases the kayak completes a total 180 degree rotation. Aerial moves are defined such that the boat is separated (except for spray) from the waters surface at the peak moment of the trick.
Flat moves are scored from 1- 5 (one way only, except intermediate classes)
Vertical moves from 6 to 10 (left and right)
Aerial moves from 11 to 15. (left and right)
Moves are scored ONCE only.
Flat moves:
180 flat spin 1pt,
360 spin, Shuvvit, 2pts
Clean 360 spin 3 pts
Clean 540 spin, 4pts
Clean 720 spin, 5pts.
Vertical moves:
Cartweel, 360 pirouette, 6pts
Clean cartwheel, Blunt, Splitwheel, 7pts
Superclean (540) cartwheel, Back Stab, retentive 360 Pirouette, Clean Splitwheel, 8pts
Sperclean (720+) Cartwheel, Morphius, Front Loop, Orbit, 9pts
Tricky Wuu, Back loop, Spyra Gyra 10pts
Aerial Moves:
Airblunt, Airwheel 11pts
Aerial Back Stab, Flipturn, Cracker Jack, Air Loop, Space Godzilla 12pts
Clean Airblunt, Aerial Back loop 13pts
Pan Am, Clean Aerial Back Stab, 14pts
Air Screw, Clean Pan Am, Helix 15pts.
Amplitude Bonus: This would apply only to quarter finals through finals, since criteria needs to be established first. Judges can add up to 2 pts to any aerial move if it is noticeably bigger that what the average competitors are doing on that day. So, if all the Airblunts are 6” out the water, and one or two competitors do an airblunt that is 18” out the water, the judge may choose to make that big airblunt worth 13pts and not 11pts. There is no set size for amplitude, but it should be at least TWICE as big as the average for that day.
The number of judges is determined by the importance of the event. 2 for small events, 4 for bigger and 6 for international events. This easily balances out any bias’.
Corran Addison 11:54 AM
Alexis
New Judging system proposed.
Schaeftlein/ Addison System
In extended discussions, Arnd Schaeftlein and I sat down, and tried to develop a new system that is based on the accuracy and objectivity of the OLD NOWR system, the current simple subjective system used in Germany, and also of elements that we felt could be used to encourage even further variety, and crowd pleasing acrobatics. The system below is the result of these discussions with Arnd, and discussions with others. I submit it for consideration.
This judging system is designed to simplify the judging to a maximum, while still being effective. This permits event organizers to use less “well trained” judges at smaller events, and still offer a high level of consistency, while offering specific, objective judging that is simple to follow, less likely to miss moves, or err on verticality perspectives than the old system, and encourages variety because a move can only be performed once (because there is no technical adding system). It also makes the judging more understandable to people who are not kayakers (press, TV and general spectators) as well as those who might be watching this on their TV’s at home. In essence, what is spectacular to the untrained eye, is also what scores well. Competitors are thus encouraged to go for “crowd pleasing” moves.
All moves are divided into three categories.
Flat, vertical and aerial.
Flat moves range from 0 to 60 degrees, and vertical moves from 60 to 120 degrees. In both cases the kayak completes a total 180 degree rotation. Aerial moves are defined such that the boat is separated (except for spray) from the waters surface at the peak moment of the trick.
Flat moves are scored from 1- 5 (one way only, except intermediate classes)
Vertical moves from 6 to 10 (left and right)
Aerial moves from 11 to 15. (left and right)
Moves are scored ONCE only.
Flat moves:
180 flat spin 1pt,
360 spin, Shuvvit, 2pts
Clean 360 spin 3 pts
Clean 540 spin, 4pts
Clean 720 spin, 5pts.
Vertical moves:
Cartweel, 360 pirouette, 6pts
Clean cartwheel, Blunt, Splitwheel, 7pts
Superclean (540) cartwheel, Back Stab, retentive 360 Pirouette, Clean Splitwheel, 8pts
Sperclean (720+) Cartwheel, Morphius, Front Loop, Orbit, 9pts
Tricky Wuu, Back loop, Spyra Gyra 10pts
Aerial Moves:
Airblunt, Airwheel 11pts
Aerial Back Stab, Flipturn, Cracker Jack, Air Loop, Space Godzilla 12pts
Clean Airblunt, Aerial Back loop 13pts
Pan Am, Clean Aerial Back Stab, 14pts
Air Screw, Clean Pan Am, Helix 15pts.
Amplitude Bonus: This would apply only to quarter finals through finals, since criteria needs to be established first. Judges can add up to 2 pts to any aerial move if it is noticeably bigger that what the average competitors are doing on that day. So, if all the Airblunts are 6” out the water, and one or two competitors do an airblunt that is 18” out the water, the judge may choose to make that big airblunt worth 13pts and not 11pts. There is no set size for amplitude, but it should be at least TWICE as big as the average for that day.
The number of judges is determined by the importance of the event. 2 for small events, 4 for bigger and 6 for international events. This easily balances out any bias’.
Corran Addison 11:54 AM
Alexis
si vous en avez en stock n'hésitez pas !!!! (il me semble qu'il y en a une belle chez le K'lçon one team)